Credits are no granted

> > The third result has an error, but is called valid anyway.
> > Validate state: Valid
> > Maybe this one was randomly selected to determine the credit for all
> > results(in this case 0, because of 0 sec CPU time). Is that possible?

Obviously this has been the (exceptional) result of several things happening at the same time:
- a restart in Phase III
- probably a still unfixed bug that reset the CPU to zero
- an "empty" result file (which is perfectly correct, and agrees with others)
(empty does not mean of zero size in this case, but no scientific content)
- one of the project meintainers reporting
- the validator, also still in testing, choosing the first of all identical results for canonical (the version submitted into CVS days ago has this fixed)

My apologies...