Error in FAQ, avoiding credit or awarding credit?

> The FAQ reads:
>
> "I claimed 100 credits for my result but only got 90. Why?
> Each machine that does work will claim a slightly different amount of credit.
> For fairness and uniformity, we have adopted the BOINC/SETI standard way to
> determine how much credit to _avoid_."
>
> Are we really trying to "avoid" credit? Or was this perhaps supposed to read
> "award"?

Oops -- thanks -- fixed.

Bruce