Credits granted to large unit are not fair

Forums › Cruncher's Corner

Anonymous
22 Apr 2007 2:57:29 UTC
Topic 13546
(moderation:
    )

    Quote:
    Personally, I'm not unwilling... and from what I read on the other threads, there were quite a few people enthusiastic about S5R2 starting. If you ask me, it's going to work out soon enough- the science app will get more efficient again, and if we really get too little credit, I'm sure that will be taken care of, too. So give the project staff a break, I think they've been doing great work so far!
    Just my 2 cents.

    This is certainly our intention. This week I will do some work on the part of the scheduler that sends shorter WU to slower hosts. That should help address part of the problems that some people have experienced, with WU that are too long for their hosts.

    Cheers,
    Bruce

    Bruce Allen
    Bruce Allen
    Joined: 15 Oct 04
    Posts: 958
    Credit: 170,849,008
    RAC: 0

    Credits granted to large unit are not fair

    22 Apr 2007 20:10:19 UTC
    Message 3121
    (moderation:
      )

      Quote:
      The only thing I have proposed is that EAH and SAH would be my choices for the 'gold' standard for the reasons I mentioned before. It does not mean that those standards shouldn't be given a reality check review periodically, or that they are forever carved in stone.

      You can find a cross-project credit comparison here. You will see that almost all projects are in good agreement with SAH. EAH was out of line. We're now fixing that.

      (The credit comparison chart was created at my request by James Drews. It provides a solid basis for cross-project credit comparisons.)

      Cheers,
      Bruce

      Comment viewing options

      Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

      Forums › Cruncher's Corner