> Thank you, but...
>
> Maybe I didn't understand well the rules, but for the WU
> H1_0443.9__0444.4_0.1_T06_Test02
> I claimed 106.70 and got 108.27 while another contributer claimed 91.17 (and
> also got 108.27).
Yes, the high and low values claimed are dropped, then the remaining values are averaged.
Bruce

Granted more credit that claimed
)
> > > Thank you, but...
> > >
> > > Maybe I didn't understand well the rules, but for the WU
> > > H1_0443.9__0444.4_0.1_T06_Test02
> > > I claimed 106.70 and got 108.27 while another contributer claimed
> 91.17
> > (and
> > > also got 108.27).
> >
> > Yes, the high and low values claimed are dropped, then the remaining
> values
> > are averaged.
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> Question on team swapping ..... In seti (classic) when a user jumped to a
> different team all his credits went with him ... has this bug been corrected
> in E@H ???
Yes, teams only accumulate credit from users when the users are in the team.
Bruce
> > > Yes, the high and low
)
>
> > Yes, the high and low values claimed are dropped, then the remaining
> values
> > are averaged.
> >
> > Bruce
> ===========
>
> Not for every WU it seems Bruce, this href="https://eah.studiodelta.us/%3Ca%20href%3D"http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu//workunit/344145">http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu//workunit/344145">Validated WU[/url]
> still received the low credit claimed out of 4 results turned in ...
Nope, it's right.
Initially the validation quorum consisted of 3 results. These were the successful ones, NOT including result #1164019. One of these was found to be invalid. In this case, where only two valid result remained, the credit granted is determined by the SETI@home algorithm:
// - if N==1, give that credit
// - if N==2, give min credit
// - if N>2, toss out min and max, give average of rest
Hence the credit granted was 42.77. When result #1164019 arrived later, it was found to be valid and given the same credit of 42.77
Bruce