> The WU's finished but just took about 4 hr's longer than it should have for
> them to do so ...
Well then - this might happen. The actual CPU time varies between the WUs in a way which is hard to predict, and it also depends on the state of the system it is running on (memory usage, other processes running (software updates, virus scanners etc)), so I would consider this to be within normal tolerances. Maybe we should raise the estimated times a bit.
Long run Times ... !!!
)
> H1_0133.4__0133.5_0.1_T16_Test02_0
> H1_0133.4__0133.9_0.1_T15_Test02_0
Thanks. These don't look suspicious to me.
> The WU's finished but just took about 4 hr's longer than it should have for
> them to do so ...
Well then - this might happen. The actual CPU time varies between the WUs in a way which is hard to predict, and it also depends on the state of the system it is running on (memory usage, other processes running (software updates, virus scanners etc)), so I would consider this to be within normal tolerances. Maybe we should raise the estimated times a bit.
BM
BM
Please see the 'front page'
)
Please see the 'front page' news item that I posted. It's relevant to this thread.
Bruce