// DBOINCP-300: added node comment count condition in order to get Preview working ?>
Anonymous
27 Nov 2006 4:23:13 UTC
Topic 13508
(moderation:
)
Thanks for the report. For the moment I think this is just a timimg problem related to the downtime, but it may also be a more serious issue. We'll check that.
The last 2 results I've returned, 55308015 and 55308012, were reported successfully and within the allotted time, however, I got the above error on both of them. It appears that both WUs were sent to 3 users instead of 2, so mine didn't count.
Thanks for your report. I'm having a look at this.
The last 2 results I've returned, 55308015 and 55308012, were reported successfully and within the allotted time, however, I got the above error on both of them. It appears that both WUs were sent to 3 users instead of 2, so mine didn't count.
What happened is that you must have detached and then reattached the host machine on 25 November. When this happens we cancel any workunits in progress, because this might be the reason that the host machine was detached.
I did make some modifications to the transitioner so that it would allow these to be validated and given credit nevertheless, but it looks as if David Anderson might have reverted those changes. I'll take a look.
Does this make sense? Did you detach then reattach the host? (I have removed identifying info from the log snippet below.)
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8053 [PID=27301] [normal ]
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8240 [PID=27301] [CRITICAL] [] [] User has another host with same CPID.
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8262 [PID=27301] [CRITICAL] [] [RESULT#55308012] [WU#19831632] changed CPID: marking in-progress result h1_0324.0_S5R1__15639_S5R1a_0 as client error!
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8269 [PID=27301] [CRITICAL] [] [RESULT#55308015] [WU#19831633] changed CPID: marking in-progress result h1_0324.0_S5R1__15638_S5R1a_0 as client error!
Result was reported too late to validate
)
Thanks for your report. I'm having a look at this.
Cheers,
Bruce
RE: The last 2 results I've
)
What happened is that you must have detached and then reattached the host machine on 25 November. When this happens we cancel any workunits in progress, because this might be the reason that the host machine was detached.
I did make some modifications to the transitioner so that it would allow these to be validated and given credit nevertheless, but it looks as if David Anderson might have reverted those changes. I'll take a look.
Does this make sense? Did you detach then reattach the host? (I have removed identifying info from the log snippet below.)
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8053 [PID=27301] [normal ]
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8240 [PID=27301] [CRITICAL] [] [] User has another host with same CPID.
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8262 [PID=27301] [CRITICAL] [] [RESULT#55308012] [WU#19831632] changed CPID: marking in-progress result h1_0324.0_S5R1__15639_S5R1a_0 as client error!
2006-11-25 21:58:24.8269 [PID=27301] [CRITICAL] [] [RESULT#55308015] [WU#19831633] changed CPID: marking in-progress result h1_0324.0_S5R1__15638_S5R1a_0 as client error!