S3 Analysis Summary Questions, Answers, Comment and Discussion

Bruce Allen
Bruce Allen
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 958
Credit: 170,849,008
RAC: 0
Topic 13121

I have just posted the long-promised first report on the Einstein@Home S3 analysis. Please use this thread for questions, answers, comments and discussion.

Bruce

Bruce Allen
Bruce Allen
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 958
Credit: 170,849,008
RAC: 0

S3 Analysis Summary Questions, Answers, Comment and Discussion

Quote:

Hmm,

Why are the graphs 5.1 and 13.3a flat lines? Or am I missing something?

5.1 is a flat line, because a detector in space far from our solar system would not be spinning or orbiting the sun and so there would be no frequency modulation due to its motion.

13.3a is not quite flat. Look at the vertical scale, and the zoom below.

13.3a/b is the frequency of a pulsar located directly over the Earth's orbital plane. There is no annual variation of the Earth's distance from this pulsar, so no annual frequency modulation. Just the (smaller) frequency modulation due to the Earth's rotation, shown in 13.3b.

Bruce

landry_m
landry_m
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 6
Credit: 245,411
RAC: 1,736

RE: Outstanding

Quote:

Outstanding report.

Interesting to note that LIGO Hanford is more sensitive than GEO600 on S3. Is GEO600 up to par on S4? What are some of the upgrades that are planned for LIGO Hanford, and how will they improve sensitivity?

Improvements in sensitivity get harder and harder as you get closer to the design goal. We've made two key upgrades at Hanford this summer, to the 4km instrument, to make it more sensitive and get very near our design goal for our one-year run, starting Nov 5, 05. The first was to swap out a suspended test mass, one of the core optics of the long arm of the machine. This optic was too reflective, scattering some excess light out of the arm and spoiling the heating (thermal lensing property) of the cavity. We installed a better, less reflective optic. This is described (with some nice photos) at: http://www.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/ligo_science/vent_0605.html

Furthermore, we've been boosting the laser power incident on the 4km machine (and the others, as well), in order to reduce the noise at high frequency (so-called shot noise)

landry_m
landry_m
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 6
Credit: 245,411
RAC: 1,736

RE: Brian Al known pulsars

Quote:
Brian
Al known pulsars are to far away to be detected by LIGO.

While it is true that many of the known pulsars are farther away than we'd like, LIGO and GEO do target them for analysis. This is typically done with different code and search algorithms than Einstein@home, for example http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0410/0410007.pdf (this preprint is a technical paper that was published in Phys Rev Letters).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.